In the day in which the government thinks to adopt a law that reduces the possibilities of Internet development, that is to say, that ad allows to a Commission hoc of the Department of Culture, to close webs without judicial previous order, me one to all that they repeat today the protest Manifesto of December 2, 2009. In the same dates I published a post (Doors for the field) reasoned inviting to reconsider the threat of the so called restrictive legislation “Law Sinde” that today comes to the Cabinet.
MANIFESTO
Before the inclusion in the Draft of Law of sustainable Economy of legislative modifications that they affect to the free exercise of the freedoms of expression, information and the right of access to the culture across Internet, the journalists, bloggers, users, professionals and Internet creators we show our firm opposition to the project, and declare that …
1. - The copyright cannot be located over the fundamental rights of the citizens, like the right to the privacy, to the safety, to the presumption of innocence, to the effective judicial tutelage and to the freedom of expression.
2. - The suspension of fundamental rights is and it must keep on being an exclusive competition of the judicial power. Not even a closing without judgment. Ete draft, against the established in the article 20.5 of the Constitution, puts in hands of not judicial organ - an organism dependent on the department of Culture - the power to the access to any web page prevent the Spanish citizens.
3. - The new legislation will create juridical insecurity in the whole Spanish technological sector, harming one of few fields of development and future of our economy, obstructing the business undertaking, introducing hobbles to the free competition and slowing down his international projection.
4. - The new proposed legislation threatens the new creators and obstructs the cultural creation. With Internet and the successive technological advances there has been democratized extraordinarily the creation and emission of contents of all kinds, which do not come already prevalentemente from the traditional cultural industries, but from multitude of different sources.
5. - The authors, like all the workers, have right to live of his work with new creative ideas, business models and activities associated with his creations. To try to support with legislative changes to an obsolete industry that he cannot adapt himself to this new environment is neither just nor realistic. If his business model was basing on the control of the copies of the works and in Internet it is not possible without damaging fundamental rights, they should look for another model.
6. - We think that the cultural industries need to survive modern, effective, believable and accessible alternatives and that are adapted to the new social uses, instead of limitations as disproportionate as ineffective for the end that they say to chase.
7. - Internet must work of free form and without political interferences protected by sectors that obsolete business models try to perpetuate and disable that the human knowledge keeps on being free.
8. - We demand that the Government should guarantee for law the neutrality of the Network in Spain, before any pressure that could take place, like frame for the development of a sustainable and realistic economy facing the future.
9. - We propose a real reform of the right of intellectual property faced to his end: to return to the society the knowledge, to promote the public domain and to limit the abuses of the managing entities.
10. - In democracy the laws and his modifications must be approved after the opportune public debate and having consulted previously to all the implied parts. It is not of receipt that there are realized legislative changes that they affect to fundamental rights in not organic law and that it turns on another matter.
SIGNED:
Enrique Meneses
Interview of Tony Garrido of RNE with Nacho Escolar, editor of the Manifesto on the law project.
It is not difficult to tell why Mariano Rajoy is a prisoner of his own contradictions. Do not think about the slander that supports that it is not known when a Galician raises or lowers a stairs. Only think about the quandary in which it shut itself up already many years ago.
It has been an error to put on the carpet the topic of the pensions in this moment because, soi-disant, in twenty years we will not have enough money to pay them. ZP has wanted to feign decision in the change of course
There is incredible the number of Spanish journalists that is thrown to the swimming pool without verifying if it has water or is empty. Before reading the foreign press and extracting conclusions on the vision that is had there of a situation that us atañe we have already thrown holders overloaded with ideology and especially alarming. We have been satisfied with throwing a glance to what the rivals are going to title and, if it is possible to put a little more of tremendismo that they. The moral of “from that it comes the wolf …” does not owe already to tell the children, it is not part of the infantile education. At least the young journalists do not remember it.
For his interest, and with authorization of Rosa Maria Artal, his authoress, I reproduce this post that they can continue in his blog
In August, 1956 and February, 1975 I traveled these two times to South Africa. In the first occasion, the
A psychiatrist, a sociologist, a communicator in search of ideas for his tesina should pay attention to all that they offer us the news and informative others, anyone that is the chain, departing from the beginning of which it is the majority way that the Spanish have to find out about what happens in the world. I recommend to them to observe the faces, the tones of voice and the writing of the news as well as the reiteration of someone ad nauseam. One looks for the depressed face, the personage who looks lost at the camera, the drama. Against more depressed, more the young informer is interested in the personage.
It is possible that José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero is a stubborn one, who is not an easy descabalgarle even if all the PP puts itself to it. But it is necessary to admit that Mariano Rajoy does not remain to the rear. They reproach ZP having
I do not manage to avoid the comparison of your initial history, yours, that of Raúl and that of so many people others, with that of those who dissent in the today Cuba. A bloodless Cambric coup d'état, in 1952, pushed you to rise in weapon against the dictator that violentaba the Constitution. On July 26, 1953, it was a Sunday and two hundred men under your control were preparing to assault the Barracks Moncada of Santiago de Cuba making use that good number of soldiers was walking drunk by the holidays of the apostle, boss of Santiago de Cuba. There were deaths for both sides and the assault ended in a defeat. The survivors stayed in Cambric hands. In the judgment you proclaimed that “the History would absolve you”. Now, serious doubts exist.
They came from all parts attracted by a fiction that we had created in the Spain of the excessive policy of economic development of the brick and of the tourism. Spain was absorbing in a decade five million foreigners attracted by an Eldorado as fragile as any mirage. What this invasion represented was much more important than we have wanted to recognize. Thousands of Spaniards, subject to the tradition of the man bringing the money to a house where it handcuffs one family mother was living subject to “your Works” (S.L). since it was appearing in the pigeonhole of “profession“ of the previous generation, they could go out to look for work out of house.